Steelers Message Board The Official Site of the Pittsburgh Steelers
search register
You must register to participate in this Message Board
Forum Index  >> About The Steelers >> Hey look... only 2 out of the 7 "experts" on nfl.com are ranking the Pats above the Steelers!
  Goto page 12 Next 
Author Message
Back to top
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 02:51 PM Post Subject
 ScottChab
Posts: 442
Back to top
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 02:54 PM Post Subject
 GoalLine
Posts: 317
hopefully only 2 out of every 7 Steeler fans care what those 7 experts have to say. (wish it was zero but some people can't help themselves)
Back to top
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 03:13 PM Post Subject
 TheStallworthSwann
Posts: 3710

The interesting thing there is that three of the alleged 'experts' rank the Vikings as the NFL's 3rd best team and the Steelers as the 4th.  It's no surprise that those three people are:

Mike Lombardi, an a s s clown who somehow masquerades as some sort of knowledgeable insider;

Vic Carucci, who's as much a football expert as a rubber chicken is;

and Pat Kirwin, a total doofus who sets all kinds of records for being wrong.

Studies show that 4 out of 5 dentists have more astute and reliable football opinions than Lombardi, Carucci and Kirwan, so their opinions have nothing but entertainment value.

As for the 2 jokers who put the Patriots ahead of the Steelers, Jason  La Canifora is a dweeb with zero credibility, and Steve Wyche is a Tom Brady/Bob Kraft  butt smoocher , so it's no surprise that they're mesmerized by the Belichick hype machine 

So the only 2 of those 7 'experts' with any real sembalnce of intelligence on football matters are Gil Brandt and Joe Thiesman, even though they both deserve a good beating  for ranking the Colts and Saints ahead of the Steelers.

Back to top
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 03:26 PM Post Subject
 phrank
Posts: 2600

For what its worth I got the following: Colts, Saints, Patriots, Steelers, & Ravens.

I can see the Steelers and Saints in the SB with all the media hype on the Saints.Their high powered offense machine meets the Steelers strauch defense. And as we all know defense wins championships!!

Back to top
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 04:10 PM Post Subject
 Skibo21
Posts: 1484
How bad is the rest of the league if these "experts" rank us 3-4? Really, early on I was very disappointed with our performance, we are riding the wave of a strong victory through a bye week, but I'm still not convinced that we are as good as last year.
Back to top
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:36 PM Post Subject
 Dave 23
Posts: 9
we are better then we were last year the Defense will continue where they left off from the Vikings game in the second half after the bye and the O line and the running game will continue to get better
Back to top
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 07:06 AM Post Subject
 defva
Posts: 180
We beat denver and we are in the three spot unless the colts or saints drop one.
Back to top
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 09:24 AM Post Subject
 phrank
Posts: 2600
quoting Skibo21:
How bad is the rest of the league if these 'experts' rank us 3-4? Really, early on I was very disappointed with our performance, we are riding the wave of a strong victory through a bye week, but I'm still not convinced that we are as good as last year.
Right now Skibo thats a tough call for me too. The only thing I feel is absolutly better is our offensive line. The AFC imo has 4-5 teams with a real shot at the SB. Us, pats, colts, ravens and maybe the chargers. Its going to be a heck of a ride.
Back to top
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 09:55 AM Post Subject
 TerribleFan_36
Posts: 337
I agree that it's hard to say whether we're better than last year or not. But last year at this time, we were also 5-2 I think having lost to the Giants and shortly thereafter lost to the Colts. Ben wasn't playing as well as he is now, he was throwing more INTs if I remember.

Remember all the offensive struggles last year we had during the regular season? I remember some ugly games where we would nothing the entire game except the last drive or two where we would pull off the win because defense kept us in the game. During that time I don't think I had a lot of confidence in winning the SB if we continued to play like that. But look how things turn out... I'm excited to see what this year has in store. Just gotta stay healthy and peak at the right time...
Back to top
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 02:19 PM Post Subject
 TheStallworthSwann
Posts: 3710
quoting phrank:

For what its worth I got the following: Colts, Saints, Patriots, Steelers, & Ravens.


Wow, do you seriously believe the Patriots are better than the Steelers?  Why?  Against the 1-6 Titans and the 0-7 Bucs the Patriots are 2-0 and won those games by a combined score of 94-7. In their other 5 games, they are a dismal 3-2 and the combined score of those games was a tight 104-91.

So in 5 games against their somewhat legitimate opponents, the Patriots average score was 20-18.  Against their 2 lame opponents, the average score was 47-3, and that is skewing people's thinking about them. They are at best an average football team, that can be beaten in many ways.  To say they're the 3rd best team in the league is giving them way, way too much credit.

  Goto page 12 Next 
Currently Online: Available to registered users only

© Pittsburgh Steelers  2009.  powered by Network Applications